1. I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.
- Provide a framework for studies (It calls for breadth and depth of research, Is not a yes/no question)
- Take a stance (It allows you to argue some point, Cannot be a recitation of facts or a list)
- Format (It is specific, The wording makes sense)
2. Review the following EQs and
- Tell us if each meets the rule of three.
- Tell why they do or don't.
a. What is the most important factor in healthy weight loss?
Meets rule of three.
b. What is most important to securing a conviction in a criminal investigation?
Meets rule of three.
c. What is most important in creating a hairstyle that best satisfies a customer?
I feel this does not meet the rule of three because the answer depends on the customer. It does not meet the Take a stance rule because it could be a list of answers.
d. How can an anesthesiologist best treat chronic pain?
Meets rule of three.
3. How can a preschool teacher help her students develop their social-emotional skill?
No comments:
Post a Comment